The matter of using libido triggering images in order to make people click an article

[367kGNh0]

I mean consequences, good fish! also the graph has been added, you asked for a citation

but it's just false.

Ok, i will get back to you on that

[zapshe]

The graph would seem to suggested no correlation between porn and rape. Only in recent years has the number gone up a tad, but the graph shows nothing about the rape figures before 1960 so we can see if rape has actually gone up after porn came to be.

[helios]

We would also need to see data on pornography consumption.

[367kGNh0]

We would also need to see data on pornography consumption.

That will not arrive. I will not risk stumbling upon sexual content.

[helios]

So basically you're admitting that you're pulling conclusions out of your ass.

[367kGNh0]

So basically you're admitting that you're pulling conclusions out of your sixth sense.

Please use more apropriate analogies. No, this is from a source I was lucky to stumble upon, I do not search into this matter, last time I did so I may well have died. On the inside

Quick question I wish only to elaborate on minorly, you did say sarcastically, according to my policy, you would harm your child if he did such. I take it you have a spouse, correct? If so, then in a sense you have found greater pleasure in digital, instant sexual content than your very wife? One's spouse may interpret such this way

[helios]

No, this is from a source I was lucky to stumble upon, I do not search into this matter, last time I did so I may well have died.

Accepting random claims you find wherever without bothering to fact-check them is basically equivalent to coming up with conclusions yourself. The point is your opinion is divorced from reality. You come up with or hear some random proposition that makes you go "yeah, that sounds reasonable" and that's what you think reasoning is.

I take it you have a spouse, correct? If so, then in a sense you have found greater pleasure in digital, instant sexual content than your very wife? One's spouse may interpret such this way

1. What if we watch it together? Is that not a possibility?
2. What if only one of us is in the mood at a given time? Are we supposed to only relieve ourselves with each other or not at all? Why? What's the point?
3. Your question presupposes that sex is objectively better than masturbation. Is it inconceivable that someone, for one reason or another, might sometimes prefer to masturbate and other times prefer to have sex, even when they're both possible alternatives? This is another pattern I've seen from you: you seem to think only in extremes. If someone wants something now they must always want that thing, and they'll never change their mind. People don't have moods.

[367kGNh0]

sex is objectively better than masturbation

(not justifying it) wives are different I suppose, but i asked the question imagining you did it discreetly from your spouse, in that case such can destroys years worth marriage, a spouse may think, "Am i not beautiful enough for him" etc. I just don't see the logic in a woman happily accepting that their beloved husband watches other naked women

[helios]

I just don't see the logic in a woman happily accepting that their beloved husband watches other naked women

Some people are insecure like that. I think getting jealous about what someone else sees or thinks is senseless.

[367kGNh0]

I think getting jealous about what someone else sees

It's the surge of concern that it may arrouse which astonishes me. The concern, judging from your posts, they lack

Hah, drageed the submit into the text box and it showed this:
javascript:editbox1.editSend() The irony. are you forced to use the word "javascript" when coding these things, the word c++, i think, incredibly rarely occurs in the code. Yet in France the ethinicity is more critical than other elements of your identity, I do image in a french shop...

Client "I want to buy toast"
Keeper "what?"
Client "I want to buy toast"
Keeper "what?"
Client "I want to buy toast"
Keeper "what?"
Client "Oh excuse my english, I want to buy french toast"
Keeper "Yes sir"

[zapshe]

Well this has been slightly weird.

I will not risk stumbling upon sexual content.

To do proper research, you've sometimes got to delve into stuff you don't want to. Not wanting to risk seeing sexual content is like never studying sea life because you don't want to see something weird or disgusting down there.

Plus, searching up something like "Is there a correlation between porn and rape" probably wouldn't turn up much sexual content. Simply check the URL before you click it.

[367kGNh0]

To do proper research, you've sometimes got to delve into stuff you don't want to. Not wanting to risk seeing sexual content is like never studying sea life because you don't want to see something weird or disgusting down there.

Rascake in this topic was not the original account creator, it was the views of another person. So I guess they did the research (cowardly? To be fair this was 2v2)

[zapshe]

Multiple people using your account?

[367kGNh0]

I know somebody who has a strong opinion on this matter. So i just executed on his behalf

[helios]

I'm sorry but you don't get to do that. If you're speaking for someone else you to say so clearly and immediately. You can't go "oh, it was actually someone else's words" when you realize you've put your foot in your mouth.

[zapshe]

I know somebody who has a strong opinion on this matter. So i just executed on his behalf

Agree with Helios. Plus, at the very least you'd have to concede that you agree with this person since your argument seemed to stem from something personal. You also said you don't wanna "risk" stumbling onto sexual content.

[367kGNh0]

You also said you don't wanna "risk" stumbling onto sexual content.

Yes, for that reason I use his claims, not my own.

[zapshe]

Umm.. Sure 🤷‍♂️👀

[367kGNh0]

please. Why the eyes?

Wow, both you and the helios' recent posts are in my lounge topics. most five atleast.

I guess now we're free to start a new discussion on this matter. Now, you could say, when it comes to skills in the matter of coding, it is good to get a variety of them in coding, employability, versatility and finding a better language over the other are among the reasons why. Now, you said you may have gained a few skills from watching pornography, but are they really of use, if (i take it they were intercourse skills, belch) if even the un-taught means in the end make a baby?

could you say same for coding, let's are Bjarn Stroutstoup
"Well, actually, a gun made with C would shoot you in the leg. A C++ gun would blow your whole foot off" (I know he did not say it like that, but you see the difference)

[zapshe]

The eyes of Judgement! MUHAHAHAHA !

0:30 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2hXuUcagK8